Getting Quality and Value from a High-Functioning Health Care System
Despite remarkable breakthroughs in biomedical research and technology, the U.S. health care system does not consistently deliver safe, effective, and affordable health care. Across the nation, health care spending is twice that of other developed countries, yet key quality and outcomes indicators lag behind international benchmarks. Mathematica researchers are proud to be active participants in the search for higher quality, more affordable health care.
- Quality Measurement: How can the quality and value of health care be measured, monitored, and reported?
- Delivery Systems: How can the delivery of health care be organized and managed more effectively and efficiently?
- Consumers: How can the health care system help patients receive higher quality health care?
- Health IT: How can health information technology improve the quality and value of health care?
- Payment Systems: How can payment systems be restructured to improve efficiency and value?
- Vulnerable Populations: What can be done to improve quality and outcomes for vulnerable populations?
How can the quality and value of health care be measured, monitored, and reported?
Improving health care quality and value requires methods to measure quality and the efficiency of the health care system. Mathematica has been at the forefront of developing, using, and reporting on measurement tools essential to understanding the performance of health care providers and organizations. Our clients include the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS); Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); California HealthCare Foundation; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE); and the states of Maryland and Massachusetts.
Developing Quality and Efficiency Measures
Implementing Measures and Monitoring Quality
Reporting on Quality
How can the delivery of health care be organized and managed more effectively and efficiently?
Models for health care delivery—such as care coordination, disease management, and medical homes—have been used to organize and manage health care more effectively. Mathematica has led a number of evaluations of these models. Our clients include CMS, AHRQ, ASPE, Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS), and Oregon Health & Science University.
Care Coordination
Disease Management
Medical Homes
Other Models of Delivery
How can the health care system help consumers receive higher quality health care?
Providing information to support consumer decision making about health, engaging consumers to be active participants in health care decisions, and providing program options that allow consumers to better access services based on their personal needs can help consumers receive higher quality care. Our clients include CMS, AHRQ, and MedPAC.
Providing Quality Information to Inform Consumer Decision Making
Engaging Consumers
Providing Program Options that Allow Consumers to Better Access Services Based on Their Personal Needs
How can health information technology improve the quality and value of health care?
Health information technology has the potential to improve the quality, reliability, and safety of health care, but we need a better understanding of how best to achieve these goals on a national scale. Substantial national investment in health information technology through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the HITECH Act, make these questions ever more urgent. Our clients include CMS, AHRQ, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), ASPE, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Cross-Cutting Studies
Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Records
Personal Health Records
Telemedicine
How can payment systems be restructured to improve efficiency and value?
Health care costs, including costs of Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and the Veterans Administration health system in particular, are rising at unsustainable rates. Innovative ways of organizing health care delivery and structuring payment systems may hold the key to “bending the curve.” Clients include CMS, MedPAC, and the state of Massachusetts.
What can be done to improve quality and outcomes for vulnerable populations?
The fact that some health care consumers do not have adequate access to insurance, high quality providers, and appropriate medications and treatments has many negative consequences for minority groups and all health care consumers. Our efforts to measure disparities and identify their causes haves led to innovative approaches to reducing disparities. These approaches include initiatives relevant to public programs, providers, and consumers.
Clients include CMS, AHRQ, CHCS, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
Mathematica's Center for Studying Disability Policy (CSDP) has also conducted research on the quality and value of care for the disabled, an important population of interest.
For more information, visit the CSDP website.
Measuring and Collecting Data to Assess Disparities
Documenting Disparities in Prescription Drug Use
How to Reduce Disparities
Back to top