Asymdystopia: The Threat of Small Biases in Evaluations of Education Interventions that Need to be Powered to Detect Small Impacts
Publisher: Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance
Oct 03, 2017
- For RCTs, evaluators must either achieve much lower rates of missing data than before or offer a strong justification for why missing data are unlikely to be related to study outcomes.
- For RDDs, state-of-the-art statistical methods can protect against inaccuracies from incorrect regression models, but this protection comes at a cost – much larger sample sizes are needed in order to detect small effects when using these methods.
You may also like...
The Impact of Healthy Harlem on the Prevalence of Child Overweight and Obesity and Contributing Factors: Interim Evaluation Report
Small Changes Make a Big Difference: How Behavioral Science Improved Participation in Advanced Placement (Issue Brief)