Leveraging Diverse Data Sources to Identify and Describe U.S. Health Care Delivery Systems
Download
Associated Project
Coordinating Center for Comparative Health System Performance
Prepared for:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Key Findings
Key Findings:
- No single national data source provides a complete picture of US health care delivery systems and their component hospitals, physician practices and physicians.
- Combining various sources can help compensate for each source’s limitations, and when information overlaps across sources, it can be used for validation
- Being able to examine linkages among system components gives researchers flexibility to tailor the definition of systems according to the objectives of their analysis
- The CHSP initiative recently released an inaugural Compendium of US Health Care Systems, which provides an early model of how such data can be used to identify systems in a way that can be updated or repeated over time and linked to other data sources to support analysis of how different types of organizations delivery health care.
Health care delivery systems are a growing presence in the U.S., yet research is hindered by the lack of universally agreed-upon criteria to denote formal systems. A clearer understanding of how to leverage real-world data sources to empirically identify systems is a necessary first step to such policy-relevant research. We draw from our experience in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Comparative Health System Performance (CHSP) initiative to assess available data sources to identify and describe systems, including system members (for example, hospitals and physicians) and relationships among the members (for example, hospital ownership of physician groups). We highlight five national data sources that either explicitly track system membership or detail system relationships: (1) American Hospital Association annual survey of hospitals; (2) Healthcare Relational Services Databases; (3) SK&A Healthcare Databases; (4) Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System; and (5) Internal Revenue Service 990 forms. Each data source has strengths and limitations for identifying and describing systems due to their varied content, linkages across data sources, and data collection methods. In addition, although no single national data source provides a complete picture of U.S. systems and their members, the CHSP initiative will create an early model of how such data can be combined to compensate for their individual limitations. Identifying systems in a way that can be repeated over time and linked to a host of other data sources will support analysis of how different types of organizations deliver health care and, ultimately, comparison of their performance.
More like this from Mathematica
Featured Publication
Evaluation of the Maryland Total Cost of Care Model: Progress Report
How do you apply evidence?
Take our quick four-question survey to help us curate evidence and insights that serve you.
Take our survey